* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I think after bgetc returns Beof, bungetc should change the state, but > not decrement bp->icount.
I don't think so. Bungetc ungets the last character read, not Beof.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I think after bgetc returns Beof, bungetc should change the state, but > not decrement bp->icount.
I don't think so. Bungetc ungets the last character read, not Beof.