well i agree that russ did a good job but JITs are fun and often make things 10 times faster.
brucee On Jan 29, 2008 11:30 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, that's very impressive! > > open: /tmp/something does not exist (2x) > no image lerp > no image doug > > But you have a preview, which I was going to add soon. > > I am sticking with my code interpreter because I know how to use one > (I toiled over hoc. and fossil ate my code up last December) and it > doesn't require hooking to a C compiler. I do like the preprocessor > idea though. > > > On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Russ Cox wrote: > > >> Byron Rakitzis (of posix rc fame) produced a version popi with the > >> JIT > >> compiler, though sadly his where for cpus which are common cpus > >> these days. > > > > Computers and compilers are fast enough now > > that you can get away with just feeding code > > into a C compiler instead of writing a full JIT. > > And there's no porting to do! > > > > I just put a pico on sources that does this - 738 lines, > > not many of which are the "JIT". > > > > 9fs sources > > cd /n/sources/contrib/rsc/pico > > mk demo > > > > Russ > > > >
