On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 17:11 -0500, Pietro Gagliardi wrote: > I don't get it... But why would you control how constructors are run?
You don't unless you're totally worried about your job security and would want to make maintenance of your code code virtually impossible. ;-) C++ at least was smart enough not to promise anything about the sequencing of constructors for global objects. Now, I can bet money that the reason they did it is for shared libraries. And that opens up a whole new can of worms right there. Thanks, Roman.
