> If you (not *we*) want to port something port it and let us know when > it's done. sorry, it my mistake, i do not mean that all community should go and port GCC :)
> The pattern of "I've just downloaded Plan9 and I want my old tools" is > very common and we just kind of ignore them :) except for the anti-GNU > troll responses. Ok, i already figure out this. I was not right(?) when start this discussion if there is no C++ in Plan9, that there are some reasons for that :) Thanks to all, i'm really sorry if i disturb anyone with this discasion )) 2008/2/4, Alf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > if we > > couldn't port GCC because it very big job (any other reason?), maybe > > we could port some other compiler with liberal enough licence? > > > > > If you (not *we*) want to port something port it and let us know when > it's done. > The process goes like this : > "I've done some working code for my XXXX C++ port, it's in my > contrib directory if someone wants to have a go with it" > > > I'm asking because C++ is very popular language, > This is Plan 9, popularity isn't very high on the list. > > The reason there is no native C++ compiler is because of it's *lack* of > popularity in the Plan 9 community, both historically and currently. > > The pattern of "I've just downloaded Plan9 and I want my old tools" is > very common and we just kind of ignore them :) except for the anti-GNU > troll responses. > > You'll (eventually) notice that *most* of the long time Plan 9 users > don't even join in the discussion, no doubt smiling a "seen it all > before" smile before pressing Del > > > > >
