I use External dedicated Back-Up drives..of the 2 one WesternDIgital and the 
other a Maxtor both are auto One Touch drives, I feel the Maxtor is the 
easiest to set up and faster at it's backup than the WD..but again, to each 
his own..--Phyllis

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Janet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 4:00 AM
Subject: Re: [A-1-Computer_Tech] Windows XP Problem


>
> This is the basis of my enquiry, I have edited for the length of the 
> report that can be read entirely, at the link.
>
> http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20020711S0009
> You can reduce System Restore's voracious appetite for disk space by 
> manually reducing the area set aside for the Restore cache area.
> Here's how to access that setting:
> In XP: Right click on My Computer, then Properties, and then the System 
> Restore tab. Select the hard drive you wish to adjust (in XP, each drive 
> can have its own System Restore setting), and click the Settings button.
> Next, in both operating systems, move the slider to choose a reasonable 
> amount of disk space for the System Restore files. I suggest you start by 
> choosing the smallest allowable Restore area (usually a still-hefty 200 
> megabytes) by moving the slider all the way to the left.
> What's Your Take?
> Do you use System Restore? Did you know it was such a space hog? Do you 
> use one of the three approaches outlined above, or do you have another 
> method of ensuring you can restore your system in the even of trouble? 
> What tricks and tools do you use to bulletproof both your data and your 
> system setup?
>
> Janet
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "JIM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>>
>> Can't help you with the future of your cache. I was confused because you
>> mentioned cache in conjnction with restore points, but they are not 
>> related.
>
>> Cache or virtual memory only applies when the computer is running. As
>> computers acquire more ram virtual memory is less of a requirement.
>> Unfortunately I think that even XP may not manage memory vs. virtual 
>> memory
>> as well as it might. [This is noting I can prove, just a suspician] 
>> Anyway.
>> I have a Gig of ram on my computer but it does not use more than a third 
>> of
>> it. I wish I had some kind of always visible monitor showing the use of 
>> ram
>> and virtual ram moment by moment. Not to always have the monitor running 
>> but
>> to give me a clue of what is typical.
>>
>> Jim
>
>
> If you have any questions or problems with any aspect of this site, please 
> feel free to contact me directly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not post 
> personal issues directly to the group.
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thank you for using A-1 Computer Tech
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.3 - Release Date: 4/5/2005
>
> 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.3 - Release Date: 4/5/2005



If you have any questions or problems with any aspect of this site, please feel 
free to contact me directly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not post personal 
issues directly to the group.

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you for using A-1 Computer Tech 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/A-1-Computer_Tech/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to