Jorell, why would you post this to this group? 

Jorell Windslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                               
Industry Counters Maryland License Bill 
 By Neil Munro
 Staff Writer
 
 Computer industry executives are aggressively trying to squash a 
 Maryland bill that would establish a licensing board for computer 
 technicians. 
 
 "Whatever gets enacted in one state, gets passed around at the 
 National Conference of State Legislatures and pops up in other 
 states," said Bruce Hahn, a Washington-based lobbyist for the 
 Computing Technology Industry Association. The association includes 
 many small companies who make, service and sell computer components 
 and software. 
 
 The Licensure of Computer Repair Technicians bill "may not make it 
 through this time, but it will make it through next time," said a 
 staff member for Delegate Joan Pitkin, D-Md., who introduced the 
 bill. 
 
 Maryland's legislature will complete its session on April 8. 
 
 Once established, the board could levy an annual license fee of $110 
 or more on computer technicians in the state. The license fee, which 
 would be paid by the employers, would be used to pay for the board, 
 which would set standards for training of computer technicians 
 throughout the state. 
 
 "If you have 100 technicians, that's an awful big burden on small 
 businesses, said Stephen Rudik, owner of SDR Solutions Inc., a small 
 computer support company based in Severna Park, Md. 
 
 Also, the law is too vague, perhaps causing the board to seek 
 regulation over 
 network managers and hardware manufacturers, said Laura Nickerson, 
 an executive at the six-person Annapolis Computers, Annapolis, Md. 
 
 The bill covers only hardware technicians, but includes all those 
 who upgrade or repair any form of computer, whether it is a desktop, 
 mainframe or even a computer within an automobile, according to a 
 Maryland government analysis accompanying the legislation. 
 
 "The licensing requirements provided in the bill could increase the 
 cost of doing business and could create new barriers to market entry 
 for new small businesses," according to the analysis, which was 
 prepared by 
 Shelley Finlayson in the state's Department of Fiscal Services. 
 
 To defeat the measure, Hahn hired Gary Alexander, a Maryland 
 lobbyist who formerly served as Speaker Pro-Tem of the House of 
 Delegates in Annapolis. The lobbying effort is needed because other 
 states would likely replicate the bill once Maryland made it law, he 
 said. 
 
 Rather than accept Pitkin's bill, the association wants to promote 
 its own quality standard, dubbed the A+ Certification, Hahn said. 
 The A+ Certification is voluntary and won't result in extra costs 
 being passed on to industry and the consumer, Hahn said.
 
 But "we could perhaps live with something less onerous" than 
 Pitkin's bill, said Hahn. 
 
 However, "we think there is going to be [licensing] legislation in 
 some states in some forms," despite the industry's lobbying efforts, 
 he said. 
 
 
     
                               

       
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



If you have any questions or problems with any aspect of this site, please feel 
free to contact me directly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not post personal 
issues directly to the group.

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you for using A-1 Computer Tech 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/A-1-Computer_Tech/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/A-1-Computer_Tech/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to