A Bitter Rift Divides Atheists
by Barbara Bradley Hagerty
NPR
October 19, 2009
Last month, atheists marked Blasphemy Day at gatherings around the world, and
celebrated the freedom to denigrate and insult religion.
Some offered to trade pornography for Bibles. Others de-baptized people with
hair dryers. And in Washington, D.C., an art exhibit opened that shows, among
other paintings, one entitled Divine Wine, where Jesus, on the cross, has blood
flowing from his wound into a wine bottle.
Another, Jesus Paints His Nails, shows an effeminate Jesus after the
crucifixion, applying polish to the nails that attach his hands to the cross.
"I wouldn't want this on my wall," says Stuart Jordan, an atheist who advises
the evidence-based group Center for Inquiry on policy issues. The Center for
Inquiry hosted the art show.
Jordan says the exhibit created a firestorm from offended believers, and he can
understand why. But, he says, the controversy over this exhibit goes way beyond
Blasphemy Day. It's about the future of the atheist movement — and whether to
adopt the "new atheist" approach — a more aggressive, often belittling posture
toward religious believers.
Some call it a schism.
"It's really a national debate among people with a secular orientation about
how far do we want to go in promoting a secular society through emphasizing the
'new atheism,' " Jordan says. "And some are very much for it, and some are
opposed to it on the grounds that they feel this is largely a religious
country, and if it's pushed the wrong way, this is going to insult many of the
religious people who should be shown respect even if we don't agree with them
on all issues."
Jordan believes the new approach will backfire.
A Schism?
Jordan is a volunteer at the center and therefore could speak his mind. But
interviews for this story with others associated with the Washington, D.C.,
office were canceled — a curious development for a group that promotes free
speech.
Ronald Lindsay, who heads the Center for Inquiry, based in Amherst, N.Y., says
he didn't know why the interviews were cancelled. As for the art exhibit and
other Blasphemy Day events the group promoted:
"What we wanted were thoughtful, incisive and concise critiques of religion,"
he says. "We were not trying to insult believers."
But others are perfectly happy to. New atheists like Oxford biologist Richard
Dawkins and journalist Christopher Hitchens are selling millions of books and
drawing people by the thousands to their call for an uncompromising atheism.
For example, Hitchens, a columnist for Vanity Fair and author of the book God
Is Not Great, told a capacity crowd at the University of Toronto, "I think
religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt, and I claim that
right." His words were greeted with hoots of approval.
Religion is "sinister, dangerous and ridiculous," Hitchens tells NPR, because
it can prompt people to fly airplanes into buildings, and it promotes
ignorance. Hitchens sees no reason to sugarcoat his position.
"If I said to a Protestant or Quaker or Muslim, 'Hey, at least I respect your
belief,' I would be telling a lie," Hitchens says.
Asked why he feels compelled to be so blunt, he responds: "I believe it's more
honest, more brave, more courageous simply to state your own position."
The more outrageous the message the better, says PZ Myers, who writes an
influential blog that calls, among other things, for the end of religion. On
Blasphemy Day, Myers drove a rusty nail through a consecrated Communion wafer
and posted a photo on his Web site.
"People got very angry," he recalls. "I don't know why. I mean, it's just a
cracker, right?"
Myers, who teaches biology at the University of Minnesota, Morris, says he
received about 15,000 hate e-mails. He says one reason he favors the
provocative approach is that it works, especially for the next generation of
atheists.
"Edgy is what young people like," Myers says. "They want to cut through the
nonsense right away and want to get to the point. They want to hear the story
fast, they want it to be exciting, and they want it to be fun. And I'm sorry,
the old school of atheism is really, really boring."
The Old School
Paul Kurtz founded the Center for Inquiry three decades ago to offer a positive
alternative to religion. He has built alliances with religious groups over
issues such as climate change and opposing creationism in the public schools.
Kurtz says he was ousted in a "palace coup" last year — and he worries the new
atheists will set the movement back.
"I consider them atheist fundamentalists," he says. "They're anti-religious,
and they're mean-spirited, unfortunately. Now, they're very good atheists and
very dedicated people who do not believe in God. But you have this aggressive
and militant phase of atheism, and that does more damage than good."
He hopes this new approach will fizzle.
"Merely to critically attack religious beliefs is not sufficient. It leaves a
vacuum. What are you for? We know what you're against, but what do you want to
defend?"
The new atheists counter that they believe in reason, science and freedom from
religious myth. And, as Lindsay, who replaced Kurtz, puts it: "We take the high
road, the low road, country roads, interstates, highways, byways, — whatever it
takes to reach people."
` ________
| |\
___|_____/_|_______,
/___ |- | [[ ___( Join Obama's Enemies List
[// \ |____| / \]
Don't worry about avoiding temptation. As you grow older, it will avoid you.
- Winston Churchill
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "A
Civil Religious Debate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/a-civil-religious-debate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
