On Jun 19, 12:48 pm, atypican <[email protected]> wrote: > The group is hardly a "failed experiment"......remember that? > > It's almost everything I hoped it would be. n(thanks in large part to > you) > > I just wish there was someone to really press me, challenge me. I am > not as good at self-challenging as I used to be, my beliefs are a > little more "cemented" than perhaps they should be. >
Well, this calls for a treatise of your beliefs. I'll challenge you. > On Jun 15, 5:57 pm, Bridge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 15, 5:24 pm, atypican <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Mainly to have my beliefs challenged and criticized. I want to explain > > > how I think as best I can, plus refine my thoughts etc.. > > > It's funny but even with the huge disparity in what we are, I find > > that everyone hanging around is pretty high level in at least what > > they are...there are so many commonalities coming out. > > > Brock posted a list of stuff he doesn't believe are axioms and almost > > everybody agreed. > > > At least we got the right foundation to work together. > > > > On Jun 9, 6:15 pm, Bridge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm explaining the group to my friend Dorn. I'm wondering, "Why are we > > > > all here?" > > > > > I'm here to break my mold and to break others. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "A Civil Religious Debate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/a-civil-religious-debate?hl=en.
