On Aug 31, 7:55 am, SM <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Bridge <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 28, 9:22 am, SM <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > So you were tracking me exactly opposite.
>
> > > So then what did you mean by: "I don't care what angel or saint or
> > > deva or demon is supposed to be talking to me. I do take as an
> > > experience the conversations I have with my psyche."?
>
> > > I took it to mean that you believe you're communicating with your psyche,
> > > however, if what's really happening is that you're communicating with
> > > demons, you care not.  You're happy to view the experience the way you
> > > please (presumably, so long as it satisfies whatever you're looking for),
> > > regardless of whatever others might think is really going on.
>
> > > Which part of that understanding is "exactly opposite" of what you
> > intended?
>
> > That's right. This, "I was tracking with you more when you were
> > describing your mystical
> > experiences as communication with angels and demons." was what I was
> > referring to.
>
> > > Can God convert you if you don't want to be converted or *will* God
>
> > > > convert you if you don't want it?
>
> > > We're incapable of desiring to be reconciled to our Creator apart from
> > the
> > > initiation that the Spirit of God takes to draw us to him by opening our
> > > mind/heart to the truth.  Our will makes choices in accordance with what
> > > we're convinced is best for us, so once the truth is revealed to us, our
> > > response is inevitable.
>
> > Determinism?
>
> Not at all.  The issue is not whether we have the power of choice (as I
> said, we choose that which we're convinced is best for us), rather, the
> issue is in what we desire.  The motivation behind our choices.
>

SM, if one cannot choose God without God "opening them" and once God
opens them they will "inevitably" choose,

it's determinism.

> > > > To be in the Body of Christ and be forgiven for my sins.
>
> > > Which means *what* to you, exactly?
>
> > It means a lot. How much do I have to know?
>
> My question was not *how much*, but *what* does your statement mean to you?

Is there a right answer?

Reply via email to