'Magnetic anomalies possibly attributed to increased solar activity' has
been my working theory for the cause of the seemingly inexplicable and
highly unusual appearance of coincidentally occurring large numbers of
animal deaths in localized ares a few weeks back.  The following
article<http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/quantum-birds/>detailing
a recent discovery in bird physiology seems to me to be consistent
and supportive of my theory since the kinds of animals reported to have died
'en mass' include those which navigate through magnetic means (i.e., fish,
birds, crabs).

European robins may maintain quantum entanglement in their eyes a full 20
microseconds longer than the best laboratory systems, say physicists
investigating how birds may use quantum effects to “see” Earth’s magnetic
field.

Quantum entanglement is a state where electrons are spatially separated, but
able to affect one another. It’s been proposed that birds’ eyes contain
entanglement-based compasses.

Conclusive proof doesn’t yet exist, but multiple lines of evidence suggest
it. Findings like this one underscore just how sophisticated those compasses
may be.

“How can a living system have evolved to protect a quantum state as well —
no, better — than we can do in the lab with these exotic molecules?” asked
quantum physicist Simon
Benjamin<http://www.materials.ox.ac.uk/peoplepages/benjamin.html> of
Oxford University and the National University of Singapore, a co-author of
the new study. “That really is an amazing thing.”

Many animals — including not only birds, but some mammals, fish, reptiles,
even crustaceans and insects — navigate by sensing the direction of Earth’s
magnetic field. Physicist Klaus Schulten <http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~kschulte/> of
the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign proposed in the late 1970s
that bird navigation relied on some geomagnetically sensitive,
as-yet-unknown biochemical reaction taking place in their eyes.

Research since then has revealed the existence of special optical
cells<http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/06/birdcompass/>
containing
a protein calledcryptochrome <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptochrome>.
When a photon enters the eye, it hits cryptochrome, giving a boost of energy
to electrons that exist in a state of quantum entanglement.

One of the electrons migrates a few nanometers away, where it feels a
slightly different magnetic field than its partner. Depending on how the
magnetic field alters the electron’s spin, different chemical reactions are
produced. In theory, the products of many such reactions across a bird’s eye
could create a picture of Earth’s magnetic field as a varying pattern of
light and dark.

‘N@C60 is quite a sexy, interesting, promising molecule.’

However, these quantum states are notoriously fragile. Even in laboratory
systems, atoms are cooled to near–absolute-zero temperatures to maintain
entanglement for more than a few thousandths of a second. Biological systems
would seem too warm and too wet to hold quantum states for long, yet that’s
exactly what they appear to do.

Researchers led by University of California, Irvine physicist Thorsten
Ritz<http://www.physics.uci.edu/~tritz/Publications/RITZ2004.pdf>
(.pdf)
showed in 2004 that, although robins had no trouble pointing their beaks
toward Africa under the influence of Earth’s magnetic field alone, adding a
second, shifting field destroyed their inner compasses. That second field
was so weak — less than one-third of 1 percent of Earth’s field — that it
could only have influenced a quantum-sensitive system.

“It shouldn’t be the case that the birds would even know that this had
happened,” Benjamin said. “If someone changed the brightness of the scene
that you’re seeing by a-third of 1 percent, you would struggle to know that
it even happened. It certainly wouldn’t muck up your vision.

In a new paper in *Physical Review
Letters<http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v106/i4/e040503>
*, Benjamin and colleagues built a mathematical model of Ritz’s experiment,
including the Earth’s magnetic field, the slight secondary field, and the
quantum systems that might make up the birds’ magnetic sense.

They calculated that, in order to be sensitive to such weak fields,
entangled states in the birds’ eyes must last for at least 100 microseconds,
or 0.0001 seconds.

To put this in perspective, Benjamin introduced an exotic molecule called
N@C60 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fullerene>, a geometric cage of carbon
with a nitrogen atom inside. This molecule is one of the best-known
laboratory systems for maintaining entanglement. “The cage acts to shield
the atom, which is storing the information, from the rest of the world,”
Benjamin said. “It’s considered to be quite a sexy, interesting, promising
molecule.”

But at room temperature, even N@C60 only holds entanglement for 80
microseconds, or four-fifths of what birds appear to be doing.

“I think this is a very nice paper that attacks the problem from an
interesting angle,” said Schulten, who was not involved in the work. “They
use a hugely simplified model, but they make an interesting point.
Entanglement could stay protected for tens of microseconds longer than we
thought before.”

“The bird, however it works, whatever it’s got in there, it’s somehow doing
better than our specially designed, very beautiful molecule,” Benjamin said.
“That’s just staggering.”

Reply via email to