the performance can be calculated as number of cores * core clock.
i only have numbers for the 9600M-GT (20 chains/sec at 500mhz) and the
GTX260 (140 chains/sec at 576 mhz). The 9600M-GT has 32 cores.
So a 9600GT with 64 cores and a slightly higher clock should be able to
do 42 chains/sec. (for example)


On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 02:39:36AM -0800, Sylv1 wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I also want to buy new harder to begin my computations. What is the best 
> quality/price in the following set and wich card performs the best for the 
> tables computation : 
> Nvidia GeForce 8400GS, GeForce 9600GT, GeForce 9400GT, GeForce 9500GT, 
> GeForce 9800GX2 and GeForce GTX260.?
> 
> Thanks
> sylv1
> 
> --- On Mon, 11/2/09, sascha <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> From: sascha <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [A51] GPU choice
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 6:25 PM
> 
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 05:46:13PM +0000, Jonathan wrote:
> > Hello list!
> > Been away for the last month with no internet access in the middle of 
> > nowhere,
> > sorry for absence.
> > 
> > I am now in the process of taking some hardware...
> > apart from Motherboard, cpu, etc, how does this GPU look?
> > 
> > ENGTX295/2DI/1792MD3 - 1792MB Asus GTX 295 55nm, 1998MHz GDDR3, GPU
> > 576 MHz, Shader 1242 MHz, 480 Cores
> 
> looks good. performance per dollar is quite bad with a GTX295 though.
> 2 GTX260 with 432 cores together cost 260Eur and a GTX295 with 480
> cores costs 370Eur. the 295 only occupies 2 slots instead of 4 with
> 2 GTX260 though.
> > 
> > Would using 2 increase (double?) performance?
> 
> scales linearly.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embarrassingly_parallel
> 
> > 
> > What countigous Disk size should I look into?
> 
> a single table occupies around 6gb, you can expect to fill 12gb per month
> with a GTX295. For the sorting you may need another 6 or 15gb of temp storage.
> that depends whether we dump stxxl which is slow and hungry (in the way it
> is used now) for our own sorter implementation.
> 
> > 
> > Jon
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> A51 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51
> 
> 
> 
>       

> _______________________________________________
> A51 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51

_______________________________________________
A51 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51

Reply via email to