On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 22:41 +0100, sascha wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 09:36:51PM +0100, Frank A. Stevenson wrote: > > > > I think it is should be compared with what you get from "purely random" > > states, it could be that our round function has a propensity for > > generating invalid states, and that would be a major flaw in our > > approach. (which advance value are you using?) > > > > F > > > > > > or mail the source code.
Or I could just do it myself, the back stepping source is available on http://traxme.net/a5/ . M vd S also mailed me an even faster version of this code. It is kind of a problem that there are lots of bits and pieces of the kitchen sink laying around in sundry places, but not comitted to SVN. Perhaps we should make a "tinkering" folder in the repository for these things ? _______________________________________________ A51 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51
