wrong . Tesla C1060 offers 240 core operating at 1300 mhz each GTX260 192 core operating at 1200 mhz each
there is a huge different , although i'd prefer GTX 285 or even GTX 295 is better > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: sascha <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM > Subject: Re: [A51] NVIDIA TESLA C1060 > To: [email protected] > > > this is not true. the 260 is about as fast as the c1060. > you only buy a tesla because of the bigger RAM (irrelevant for > brute forcers), better drivers (irrelevant), somehow higher > quality chips and more testing done (largely irrelevant to bruteforcing). > for the a5/1 table generation an error rate of 1% is bearable, > and i have not seen my *overclocked* gtx260 make a mistake in > the last year during numerous debug sessions. > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:57:12PM +0100, Jakub wrote: > > I write about this because brute force password breaking > > for rar archives and pgp encrypted files with recovery > > software when c1060 is used is about 8-10 time faster then > > using gtx260, and sometimes on Ebay is pssible to buy it > > for 1000-1200USD > > > > > > Dnia 22-01-2010 o godz. 15:25 Mark Janssen napisał(a): > > > 2010/1/22 Jakub <[email protected]>: > > > > Is it possible to use Nvidia Tesla C1060 device for computation > tables ? > > > > > > Since it has CUDA support, yes. I doubt it would be more > > > cost-efficient than simply using graphics cards, though. Within the > > > prices I found you could buy at least 10 regular high-end cards. > > > > -- > > Pozdrawiam > > jakub, [email protected] > > > >
_______________________________________________ A51 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51
