Bryan Creer rambles on with:

|  Of course nobody says "This is in F sharp, C sharp" rather than saying it's 
|  in D.  

Actually, I have heard people say things like "Let's play it  in  two
sharps"  occasionally,  but I'd agree that this isn't common phrasing
in any crowd that I hang out with.

|  ...  there is a very strong pub music scene around here 
|  (East Sussex, England) and I could and, sometimes do, go to several sessions 
|  a week.  Nobody EVER mentions modes.  They just aren't part of our thinking 
|  and I'm talking about some very good musicians.  

I'd wonder about this claim.  My guess is that you're  one  of  those
people  who don't consider "major" and "minor" to be modes.  But they
are, of course. I hear these two mode names fairly often.  Of course,
people  often  say "major" for "mixolydian" and "minor" for "dorian",
but that's another issue.

This "major  and  minor  aren't  modes"  misunderstanding  is  rather
common.   Here in the USA, the term "modal" is often used, especially
by the Old-Timey and Bluegrass crowd, to  refer  to  tunes  that  are
mixolydian or dorian, i.e., the tunes that use the major chord on the
low 7th in harmonies.  This is sorta wierd  terminology,  of  course,
since  it  implies  that major and minor don't qualify as modes.  But
what can ya do?
 
|  I was, of course talking a load of twaddle about Scan Tester's No 2 to make a 
|  point, although I still think there is more to it than simple G major.  

Probably the most interesting point is that, if you were  to  try  to
write  a  routine  that discovers the key (tonic+mode) of a piece, it
would be a good test piece. One of the standard rules is "Look at the
last  note",  but  this  fails  for  this  tune.  It's not an unusual
failure.  Someone else has already pointed out  that  ending  on  the
dominant  is fairly normal in many kinds of music.  The British Isles
traditions also have a good number of "neverending" tunes that  don't
cadence on the tonic at all, but just keep returning to the beginning
forever.  The human ear hears this pretty easily, but an algorithm to
discover it isn't simple.

|  World domination?  Go for it!  But you'll do better by being inclusive rather 
|  than exclusive.  Get people on board with a sytem they understand and then 
|  teach them about modes.

Yup.  I've found that one of the easiest way to start an  explanation
of modes is to simply tell people that they already know two of them:
major and minor.  Go into what makes these different, mostly the  3rd
of  the  scale.   Then  play a familiar tune such as Old Joe Clark or
Red-Haired Boy that is clearly "funny" in some sense.   Explain  that
this is actually a different mode, similar to major but not quite the
same.  I've found that  most  people  follow  this  explanation  very
easily.   Then  you  can  quickly  go  into  why  some  music  sounds
"different", by explaining that it is simply using a different  scale
that has its own logic, but one that they're not used to hearing.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to