Wendy Galovich says - > ..And thank you Bryan, for indirectly acknowledging through your > wording here that there ARE legitimate reasons for *continuing* to sup- > port the tonic/mode system as a choice, apart from the need to have > other choices as well. I have DIRECTLY acknowledged that in the past and it has always been my point of view. I don't want to use the tonic/mode system myself but if it suits others that's fine. If you can find anything I've said otherwise, please quote me. I withdrew from the discussion a few months ago because I got fed up with trying to explain what I meant to people who had clearly stopped listening and who seemed to regard a sharps/flats K: command as anathema. It's "WE, who like it the way it is" that seem to want to deny choice. Bryan To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
