In a moment of absent-mindedness I wrote: >The way around it is to take advantage of the extended tuplet notation >described >in the next section of the standard, and write: > >(5:4:4 > >meaning five notes in the time of four for the next four notes, which is what >you want. > No it aint. What you want is 5 notes in the time of 4 for the next FIVE notes, so it should be: (5:4:5 Phil Taylor To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- [abcusers] Quintuplets Frank Nordberg
- Re: [abcusers] Quintuplets Phil Taylor
- Phil Taylor
