In a moment of absent-mindedness I wrote:

>The way around it is to take advantage of the extended tuplet notation
>described
>in the next section of the standard, and write:
>
>(5:4:4
>
>meaning five notes in the time of four for the next four notes, which is what
>you want.
>

No it aint.  What you want is 5 notes in the time of 4 for the next FIVE
notes, so it should be:

(5:4:5

Phil Taylor


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to