--------

 Bryan writes:

| I will, but as I have said, abc is useless as an exchange medium if we ar=
| e=20
| not all talking the same language.

Well, now, it seems to me that this is disproved  by  even  a  casual
glance at the current situation.  There is a fairly significant range
of discrepancy in how various abc tools implement  various  parts  of
the notation.  If the above were true, then abc as it is now would be
useless.  But a lot of people are finding it very useful.

The claim that abc must be a consistenly-implemented  standard  is  a
red herring. This isn't true at all, just as it isn't true for any of
the other standards in the computing industry.  Standards  are  never
implemented   consistently   by   different   developers.   And  some
widely-used  tools  (such  as  unix  ;-)  have  radically   different
implementations  on  different  platforms,  while  still  being  very
useful.

This isn't just ranting. Claiming that we *MUST* all step to the same
drummer  is actually a way of suppressing innovation.  If ABC is kept
in a little box and developers  are  discouraged  from  experimenting
with extensions, then it will be forever frozen at its current state.
It will remain useful for a  few  kinds  of  music,  but  will  never
develop into a more generally useful notation.

ABC was a very useful start on a simple, human-readable and emailable
music  notation.   It was limited, and saying this is no criticism of
Chris's work. Good tools often start off simple and limited, and grow
with  time  to include new capabilities.  But this growth hardly ever
happens with a central dictatorial control.  It happens if you have a
lot  of  interested  developers who feel they have the freedom to try
out new ideas and present them to the user community.

Keeping abc in a straightjacket by insisting  that  we  must  all  be
talking  the  same  language  will in the long run be fatal, and will
relegate abc to the fringe.  That may be the intention of some.   But
there  are a lot of kinds of music in this world, and musicians don't
talk the same language at all. I'd rather see abc continue to develop
as  a  user-accessible,  emailable music notation that more musicians
can use.  This requires that we accept variations and extensions, and
that  we  discuss  them  with  the idea of developing ABC into a more
widely-usable notation.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to