Mike Whitaker wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 07:19:06AM -0600, Richard L Walker wrote:
>> Why not use everything? If you pick up a book of chords it can be daunting,
>> but allowing a program to build any chord should be very straightforward.
>
>*sounds of faint weeping*
>I've done this.
>I posted the semi-formal grammar to the list.
>I put a CGI up on the web which follows this grammar and parses almost
>any chord you can name.
>I've been trying to advance this whole argument for two weeks.
>*shuffles off, stage left, to mass indifferemce*
Don't despair, Mike. A large proportion of people reading this list
won't want to comment on your proposal, either because they are not
into complex chord symbols or don't understand the formal grammar or
whatever. Give us the proposal again in English, styled as in the
draft standard and let's see what comment that generates.
Phil Taylor
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
