Steve Mansfield  asks:
| Mention of the standards committee prompts the thought :

Y'know, I haven't received any  email  from  them  recently.   Either
there's  no  current  activity, or I've been dropped from the mailing
list.  Maybe I should ask.  Probably no need to, though, since all of
the committee are on this list.

| Where's the standards committee up to? Are we any closer to putting some
| of the current incompatibilities and bifurcations to the vote?

As far as I'm aware, the activity so far has been mostly to work on a
more formal "baseline" standard that matches Chris's 1.6 doc.

| And, in the mean time, can I take this opportunity to repeat my request
| for some kind person to point me at the URL of the page someone put
| together recently about the differences and similarities between the two
| (+?) versions of the V: field?

I've been experimenting a bit in my tune finder's clone of abc2ps, to
see  how  much  of  the  extant  V:   lines  I  can  get it to handle
automatically.   So  far,  I  think  there's  actually  no  important
incompatibility  other  than  the old "octave" question (whether bass
lines need zillions of commas). The rest of the V: clauses can simply
be  merged.  The proposed middle= clause seems a very usable solution
to the octave that also has the benefit of allowing people like me to
define  things like French violin clef and various other non-standard
note-to-staff mappings.

I'm still contemplating a heuristic to try to discover which  mapping
was used when there's no middle= clause, but I haven't implemented it
yet.  Maybe I should get at it.

There are some things in V:  lines that I don't  understand  and  are
currently  ignored by my abc2ps clone.  Maybe I should make up a list
of them and ask what they mean.  So far, ignoring them seems to  have
worked.   I  suspect  they  have something to do with producing sound
files, which abc2ps doesn't do, so they may not be significant to me.

I have seem some symptoms of people who have discovered the V:  lines
and  are  using  them without invoking any abc software.  That is, V:
lines are being used to communicate to other  human  readers  of  the
abc.  I suspect that there are more abc readers about than many of us
might guess. For someone who doesn't read music, abc may be easier to
learn than standard staff notation.  This would, of course, lead to a
lot of "illegal" V: lines in the abc that we see on a number of music
mailing lists.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to