Phil Taylor a skrivas:
> Henrik Norbeck wrote:
> >Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> >> - !repeatbar!, !repeatbar2!, ...
[snip]
> >As I understand the idea behind the draft standard, the
> >!something! can be used for accents, but also for other symbols. I
[snip]
> Reformulated is an understatement. That section of the draft standard
> is total mess. It confuses and conflates the ideas of redefinable
> symbols and macros, while introducing the totally unnecessary !text!
> construction. I've had both things working in BarFly for several
> years, using the syntax which was formulated back in the old abc
> developers group. It works beautifully and I have no intention of
> replacing it with something which is clearly inferior.
Sorry for I did not follow this old thread. I'd be glad to know how BarFly
handles:
- the dynamic signs ('f', .. - bold fonts -, 'cresc', .. - italic fonts),
- the repeat symbols ('da coda', 'al segno', ..),
- strange glyphs as 'slide', 'coda', 'fermata' or 'arpeggio',
- long signs as 'this trill starts here, and stops there',
- the measure repeat indication which was the current question ;),
- and, generally, a specific sign this fuc^H^H^Hsympathetic user wants to
have in his score.
--
Ken ar c'henta� | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
| http://moinejf.free.fr/
P�p� Jef | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (job)
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
