John Chambers wrote:
> 
> --------
Hello,

> Simon Wascher schrieb:
(...)
> | $ Example: P:[Einleitung][1.][1.][2.][2.][1.][Ausgang]

John Chambers wrote:
> Less messy would be to just use either of:
>   $ Example: P:Einleitung,1,1,2,2,1,Ausgang
>   $ Example: P:Einleitung 1 1 2 2 1 Ausgang
> 
> These are both unambiguous and more readable. 

(The dot after the number was intended to be printed: "1." in the
P:field in the body)

My intention was a standard that allows empty spaces, commas and other
common characters within an active P:field, I thought that squared
brackets as separators are the most un-used but commonly known and
available characters, which also have the advantage to have a direction,
so there is a clear i n b e t w e e n (and in opposit to < > they are
not html).

Examples:
P:second part  
(why not?)

P:Einleitung, auch als Coda 


regards

Simon

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to