John Chambers wrote:
>
> --------
Hello,
> Simon Wascher schrieb:
(...)
> | $ Example: P:[Einleitung][1.][1.][2.][2.][1.][Ausgang]
John Chambers wrote:
> Less messy would be to just use either of:
> $ Example: P:Einleitung,1,1,2,2,1,Ausgang
> $ Example: P:Einleitung 1 1 2 2 1 Ausgang
>
> These are both unambiguous and more readable.
(The dot after the number was intended to be printed: "1." in the
P:field in the body)
My intention was a standard that allows empty spaces, commas and other
common characters within an active P:field, I thought that squared
brackets as separators are the most un-used but commonly known and
available characters, which also have the advantage to have a direction,
so there is a clear i n b e t w e e n (and in opposit to < > they are
not html).
Examples:
P:second part
(why not?)
P:Einleitung, auch als Coda
regards
Simon
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html