On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 12:13:36PM +0000, Jack Campin wrote: > No it isn't. I suggested it on the principle that if we're going > to use up yet another character we'd better get as much use out of > it as possible, and this construct does far more than the proposed > Z while taking up the same amount of lexical lebensraum.
Actually, I wanted & to represent two voices on one staff, where one voice has stems up and one voice stems down. (Common in vocal music.) e.g. |CDEF&GABC| -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me. "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -- Florence Ambrose
msg03172/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
