On 30 Jan 2002, Laura Conrad wrote: > I agree that in ABC, where the assumption is that what the user enters > is what a printing program should print, it's a bug. This is a case > which does demand some special code. > > Alternatively, the standard could address the problem in such a way > as to cause the bug to be in abc2ps and friends for printing the > second sharp in the version with both F's sharped.
Or both! What I love about abc is that you type the same as you would write on a piece of music paper. Why not have both CDE^F- | F and CDE^F- | ^F print the same way (actually as the top one) and play or midify the same (as the second one). Another way to put this is that the second "^" in ex 2 is optional. -- Atte To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
