On Tue, 28 May 2002, James Allwright wrote:
> On Tue 28 May 2002 at 08:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > James Allwright wrote:
> > 
> >  >The inconsistency is deliberate. The point is that when you play
> >  >a hornpipe or anything else with dotted rhythm (or swing, or
> >  >whatever you want to call it), keeping a 3:1 ratio is rather
> >  >harder than keeping a 2:1 ratio and doesn't really add much
> >  >musically apart from a certain pedantic pleasure in knowing that
> >  >you are playing exactly what your notation says. This is why
> >  >abc2midi makes the assumption that a>b is meant to be played as
> >  >a 2:1 ratio. I think this is in accordance with the original
> >  >spirit of '>' even if this is not spelt out in the standard.
> > 
> > It sounds like you're saying that ">" cannot be used to notate the
> > first notes of "Mari's Wedding" to play as I've always heard it
> > played. This would be unacceptable.
> 
> No-one else has used Mairi's Wedding to define the meaning of ">".
> What ">" and "<" gives you in abc2midi is a notation for tunes in 
> 6/8 masquerading as tunes in 4/4. This covers hornpipes and probably 
> strathspays (though I can't tell since I don't get to hear very many 
> of those).

Strathspeys are definitely not "6/8 masquerading as 4/4". In most cases it
would definitely be wrong to play them as 2-and-one (if I say "in all
cases" someone'll dig up a counterexample. I wouldn't be suprised,
they can be weird things) - much more like 3-and-one.

I would question _your_ use of the word "notation", too :) I'd call it an
interpretation of the notation. After all, your parser reads it as "note,
greater/less than, note", and yaps displays it as we'd all expect :)

(I've been looking at your parser recently - I'm in the process of
borrowing it for an improved version of my tunes-comparison project; 
which should be ready for the web before long). 


-- 
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem


To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to