4/8 sharp IS a full sharp (as you know, the reference interval is always a whole tone). Therefore labeling it ^4 may be a bit misleading, but it's ok if you can use the symbols alternatively. Other than that, I like it.

Microtonal notation is mostly used to approximate tonal events that can't be described with 12 TET (12-tone equal temperament). While a 7/8-tone sharp theoretically exists, one would rather think of it as a 1/8-tone lowering of the tone a whole step above. So, instead of thinking C 7/8 sharp, think D 1/8 flat.

Regards,

Georg Hajdu

On Wednesday, Jun 25, 2003, at 21:23 Europe/Berlin, I. Oppenheim wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Georg Hajdu wrote:

Proposed symbols for eighth-tone notation:

1/8 sharp: =` ( ` is back quote is ascii 96)

[snip]

3/4 flat: \ or ` `_

Example A `= would be middle-a eighth-tone flat or 6875 MIDI cents.

If these are the symbols you need, what about:

1/8 sharp: ^1
2/8 sharp: ^2
3/8 sharp: ^3
4/8 sharp: ^4
5/8 sharp: ^5
6/8 sharp: ^6
full sharp: ^
1/8 flat: _1
2/8 flat: _2
3/8 flat: _3
4/8 flat: _4
5/8 flat: _5
6/8 flat: _6
full flat: _


Wouldn't that be easier?

Your example would be _1A (Accidentals come before the
base note).

Let me know what you think.

BTW: Is there no 7/8 sharp or flat? do double
accidentals occur in microtonal notation?


Groeten,
Irwin Oppenheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~*
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to