On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:10:04AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote: > Richard Robinson wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:14 > > > >So all we can do is, find all abc programs that aren't being maintained, > >and document the common subset :( > > > > > > > I think it would be appropriate to have a section in the standard on > legacy applications. If it's documented that abc2win and other old > applications are (as of the date of the standard) not supported and not > expected to conform to the ABC 2.0 standard, that may be good enough.
It woul be a start. I fear the only real answer (or not even that) would be for some masochistic altruist^H^H^H^H wonderful person to write a Windows app providing similar functionality, to which people could be encouraged to "upgrade" in order to solve compatability problems. -- Richard Robinson "The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
