I'm just doublechecking since this conversation spun off of the
universal parser conversation...
This conversation, while interesting doesn't actually pertain to the
parser does it? I've been trying to follow it in case it does.
My understanding is that a parser will not do any file handling, and
that the super program calling it will do all the filehandleing. Is
this correct?
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- Re: [abcusers] reusable parser Richard Robinson
- Re: [abcusers] reusable parser Stephen Kellett
- Re: [abcusers] reusable parser Paul Rosen
- Re: [abcusers] reusable parser David Webber
- Re: [abcusers] reusable parser Martin Tarenskeen
- Re: [abcusers] subject line abuse (was: resuable p... Jeff Szuhay
- [abcusers] Falcon 68030 Stephen Kellett
- Re: [abcusers] Falcon 68030 Phil Taylor
- [abcusers] File names [was: reusable parser] John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] File names Steven Bennett
- Re: [abcusers] File names Christian M. Cepel
- Re: [abcusers] File names Steven Bennett
- Re: [abcusers] File names Stephen Kellett
- Re: [abcusers] File names Steven Bennett
- Re: [abcusers] File names Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] File names Stephen Kellett
- Re: [abcusers] File names Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] File names Christian M. Cepel
- Re: [abcusers] File names Jack Campin
- Re: [abcusers] File names Christian M. Cepel
- Re: [abcusers] Unicode [was: file names] Steven Bennett