not to overstate java's cross platform attributes - but at least I can
put all the platform specific stickiness in one module and compile it
all on the Mac...
wil
Guy Gascoigne - Piggford wrote:
More to the point if java is being chosen as a simple means for cross
platform deployment then jni suddenly makes this much more
complicated. You suddenly go from one distribution to n of them :(
Guy
Wil Macaulay wrote:
Yes, I know I _can_ access them. They are no advantage to me. My
Java objects are lightweight, and
the same jar file can run on any platform without requiring separate
compilation of JNI wrappers. I'm
not trying to diminish the theoretical value of cross-language
support, I'm simply suggesting that
it would be low on my list of requirements (spoken as a product
manager...)
wil
Stephen Kellett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wil Macaulay
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
with in your target language. I can say quite honestly that C
datastructures in memory are of no use to
me as a Java developer
You can access them. Write a JNI wrapper, then you can read them and
store them any way you desire. JNI isn't hard, all the tools are
there to help you.
Stephen
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:
http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
