Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 6/17/06, Gav.... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm not really a fan of Wikis in this scenario. >> >> We have Jira (or will have) for patches, proposals etc and those >> Contributing doc enhancements can also put them on Jira for someone >> To review and commit. There is a website to put this information and >> Guides, how-tos etc, it could get confusing for users, where do they >> Go for upto date accurate info, the Wiki or the Website. It can be >> Cumbersome to maintain, just maintaining the website and keeping it >> Upto date in terms of code changes and howtos will be a big job, no need >> To have to keep a Wiki updated also. >> >> SVN and Jira work well together, keeping good track of issues and >> patches, >> Doc changes etc. It would make sense to have contributions, whether docs >> Or code be put up as a Jira Issue instead. >> >> That said, other projects seem to manage ok with both, so I'm not against >> It, just not a fan. My 2 cents at this stage as an observer, a bit too >> Early for me to join in really. > > I'm also not seeing a real need for a wiki at this point, although if > people want one then we can certainly look at getting one set up. > > -garrett >
Since not many are interested, it would be unwise to create one because it won't get updated. I think Jira + SVN will definitely be enough to get us organized, especially at first. I was just throwing the question concerned with non-committers, but then again they can submit patches through Jira on whatever. -Elias
