Either way works for me. I'll work on pulling it down like the other dependencies.
Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Author: jmsnell >> Date: Thu Jul 6 15:08:30 2006 >> New Revision: 419720 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=419720&view=rev >> Log: >> Incorporates Retroweaver into the ant build. >> >> To run: ant -f build/build.xml retro >> >> Both the JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.4.2 jars will be in the "dist" folder, with >> the 1.4.2 jars suffixed with "retro". >> There is one additional dependency (retroweaver-rt-1.2.3.jar) for the >> 1.4.2 jars that is copied to the dist/lib directory. > > Umm, no argument against using retroweaver, but do we really want to > put a snapshot of it in our source tree? I'd be much more comfortable > with it living outside our tree, or pulling it in like any other > dependency or something like that... > > -garrett >
