Ok, I'll take a look at the code later today. - James
Brian Moseley wrote: > On 4/24/07, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I had originally started down this path but quickly realized that the >> checking was going to end up being very provider specific. In all of >> the implementations I've put together, the checking code always ended up >> in the Provider implementation. I'm not 100% set on that tho, I'm just >> not sure it's something that can be moved easily to the framework code. > > so far i haven't seen anything provider-specific in my implementation. > take a look when you get a chance and let me know if you have any > comments. i'll keep working on it and report back when i have more to > say ;) >
