Ah right. We could include something on that. Just to make sure I'm remembering correctly... that discussion left off with the extensions needing to be publicly described and with a RF license... is that correct?
- James Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 5/8/07, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just that we're working towards the 0.3.0 release... and waiting for the >> Atompub WG to finish up the APP spec so we can wrap up support for APP. >> From there it's just a matter of refining the APIs, fixing bugs, and >> implementing support for whatever additional extensions we want. > > How about the discussions about how to handle vendor specific extensions? > > -garrett >
