That's what I would prefer. At this point the code should be up to date with the pending -15 draft that will go to the IESG. While I'm not completely happy with the client API, we've got the functionality needed. We can work on refining the client API in the 0.4.0 stream.
- James Adam Constabaris wrote: > [snip] > On another topic: is the current plan to have a 0.30 release soon after > the APP draft is submitted to the IESG? > > AC > >
