On 8/20/07, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The extensions module is growing. This is a good thing :-). Currently, > a single extensions jar is built that contains all of the extensions. > This makes distribution and deployment easy but requires that folks ship > code that they are potentially not using. One possible solution is to > generate multiple extension jars (one per extension). I have no real > preference either way. What say y'all?
i generally prefer smaller, more focused jars, especially when i'm repackaging them in an application that my users have to download, so i'm +1 to breaking the extensions up into separate jars.
