*If* we ever get into parsing JSON, looking at a library like this would make sense. As it stands now, all we're doing is serializing, which turns out to be quite simple. For that, a library is really not needed.
- James Dan Diephouse wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Author: jmsnell >> Date: Mon Sep 24 16:13:02 2007 >> New Revision: 579015 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579015&view=rev >> Log: >> Reworking of the JSONWriter. This provides a more complete >> Atom-to-JSON conversion that includes extensions, support for >> atom:feed, app:service, etc. This should be considered to be a work >> in progress rewrite. >> >> Oh, and this gets rid of the dependence on the third party json.jar. >> There is one method in the new JSONUtil class that was taken from the >> json.jar. I will be rewriting that method soon. We should be able to >> completely drop that jar from the dist. >> >> > Could be overkill, but there is a new comer to JSON & Java: Jackson > (written by Tatu who wrote woodstox): > > http://www.cowtowncoder.com/hatchery/jackson/index.html > http://www.cowtowncoder.com/blog/archives/2007/09/entry_47.html > > - Dan >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
