Damn I'm good... I just *knew* you were going to ask for that ;-)
Dan Diephouse wrote: > Dan Diephouse wrote: >> How would people feel about making the RequesstContext properties more >> flexible? Instead of an enumeration of keys, it'd be nice of the >> RequestContext was more hashmap like and we could set arbitrary >> properties. RequestContext could extend Map<String,Object> or add >> set/removeProperty() methods. Then I could shove anything in there >> that I want and only have to pass the RequestContext around :-) >> >> - Dan >> > Wait, right after I hit send I saw setAttribute and that is what I need. > Nevermind... > > - Dan >
