Dan Diephouse wrote: > Rereading my message, I think I might of said one thing but meant > another. What I really meant was, MimeType isn't one of those classes > that is used across java projects. So using the JAF MimeType doesn't > really buy us much and I don't see any issue with replacing it. >
Heh... why didn't you say so! ;-) > BTW, 20-30 ms seems like an awfully long time... Are you running -server > -XX:ParallelGC, letting the server warm up, etc? > No. These informal benchmarks are based on "cold bore" tests running within Eclipse. Later this week I plan on running more detailed end-to-end profiles. - James
