I have an objection to this. It focuses too much on implementation details. I'd prefer to go the other way towards a name that describes what it does, not how it does it. You're not adapting iBatis, you're adapting data from a database. There must be another way to say this. The package namespace seems to make sense but not the class name. davep
On Feb 12, 2008 5:11 AM, David Calavera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen JdbcCollectionAdapter depends on IBatis and I think the name is > ambiguous when I read "Jdbc" I think on a native jdbc connection to the > database without orms. I think we should rename this class to > IBatisCollectionAdapter and move it to some other package like " > org.apache.abdera.protocol.server.adapters.orm.ibatis". > > Unless you have no problem, I'm going to create the jira issue and submit > a > patch. > > Btw, I'm thinking on create an HibernateCollectionAdapter XD. > > Cheers >
