Agreed on DefaultTarget/AbstractTarget.
Have you guys seen TargetType.NOT_FOUND? I needed this for my app and
added it a few weeks ago. For a rather complex, hierarchical example
which basically provides full directory capabilities see:
http://fisheye.muleforge.org/browse/galaxy/trunk/web/src/main/java/org/mule/galaxy/atom/ArtifactResolver.java?r=349
I've been meaning to write this up, but may be a few days yet...
- Dan
Glen Daniels wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
We're supposed to have a rationale? :-)
404 would be better. Want to submit a patch?
Sure.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ABDERA-124
You'll note that I made AbstractTarget (which didn't actually have any
abstract methods) a non-abstract class in order to get rid of
UnknownTarget as a separate class.
If you look at it, DefaultTarget and AbstractTarget are just about (if
not totally) identical. Can we get rid of one of them, and maybe call
the one we keep either BaseTarget or DefaultTarget?
Thanks,
--Glen
--
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
