-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2011 04:17 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
>
> I think we have a lot of things on the agenda next time:
>
> * Architecture doc
> * I just sat in on a call and I believe there will be a proposed use
> * case doc
> * gss main spec
> * Gss naming spec
> * The AAA SAML doc
> * Discussion of where our dependencies are
> ** naming exts from kitten
> ** channel binding from EMU
Less urgent but still worth considering:
- - diameter spec (we will probably have a candidate)
- - presentation on the nfsv4/pnfs use case
>
> We didn't even get to the gss naming document last time, and we had more
> SAML discussion than we really had time for.
>
> It's also fairly likely that we're going to have some implementation
> meetings shortly before the IETF, so we will hopefully have a lot of
> progress and thus issues to bring up at IETF.
>
>
> I wonder whether 3 or 4 hours might make more sense. I think we could
> find easy points for session breaks.
We could try to go for 2 x 2 hours but I need to know that people will
show up even if this means one of the sessions is on Friday!
The yang group had good experience with having 2 sessions with the more
generally accessible topics on the first "mid-week" session and a Friday
session with topics that required more deep insight and active
participation.
How does that sound?
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0use0ACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnchpQCfQdbLA1z8grT2bh0wjSRBDfBs
D4cAmwQKUlvn7X52/mYTaqNtriN2vDMq
=Htn9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
