> -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:33 PM > To: Jim Schaad > Cc: 'Klaas Wierenga'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [abfab] draft-lear-abfab-arch-01 posted > > >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Schaad <[email protected]> writes: > > We're talking about various SAML exchanges defined to support SOAP over > HTTP. Basically, when we've been talking about SOAP we're using that as > shorthand for the SAML profiles for an SP talking to an IDP that exist today. > > We're arguing about the balance between our AAA transport and the > existing transport and what should be used when why by whom.
I agree that SOAP over HTTP is the most common, but it is not the only binding that exists. It would be potentially useful for me to be able to send SOAP messages over DIAMETER at some point in the future. So for me the distinction between the message format and the transport is a useful distinction. Jim _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
