Klaas, > > Thanks for pulling this together. However I'm wondering if it's > > really necessary to devote nearly 50% of the first session to > > discussion of an ABFAB implementation. I would be more inclined to > > spend this time on discussion of the architecture and use-case > > documents. > > Well, one way of saying it is "nearly 50%", the other is "only 25 > minutes" ;-) Do you really think you can do with much less than that?
Well, I'm questioning whether a Moonshot update is appropriate given the demands on time. We would be very happy to do an update, but I wouldn't want to consume time that could be better spent discussing ABFAB documents. Do Eliot and Rhys, as editors of the other two documents, have a view on this? I was assuming that discussion of these two docs alone could take 60 minutes, but perhaps not. Josh. JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
