>>>>> "Eliot" == Eliot Lear <[email protected]> writes:
Eliot> On 7/28/11 10:01 AM, Klaas Wierenga wrote:
>> On 7/28/11 3:57 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> Eliot,
>>
>>> I won't be at the ABFAB meeting, but I have discussed with the
>>> chairs and authors an approach to move the document forward. As
>>> people will recall, we sort of snagged on normative language.
>>> The authors have agreed to work to remove that language. What I
>>> propose is the following:
>>>
>>> 1. A new draft that does so in August; 2. Adoption of this
>>> document as a working group document; and
>>
>> So you are not asking to adopt the document as WG document at
>> this time? Why don't you think the draft is far enough ahead to
>> hand over change control to the WG? It seems to me that the issue
>> of the normative language can also be solved for a WG doc....
Eliot> I would be happy if the WG adopted the draft now, with the
Eliot> understanding that the normative language will be removed.
If by normative language we're talking about requirements on EAP methods
that have moved into draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap, then I agree.
Regardless I'd encourage the WG to adopt now.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
