I think I may have been unclear in what I was proposing. I'm proposing that the peer send its identity in the first message (*) and that the server gets to respond with type 4 or greater (a specific EAP method). I'm proposing dropping the identity request, not the identity response.
(*) There's a case where we ask the acceptor what its name is. In that case I think it is desirable to let the peer wait to receive the acceptor name before sending an identity. In all these cases we support identity hiding. _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
