On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Sam Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > Nico> Given that the context token exchange is synchronous, there's > Nico> no need for any token IDs as such. Or so I would think > Nico> (sub-token IDs, sure, if there's any sub-tokens that require > Nico> identification). > > Sure, although RFC 1964 and RFC 4121 had them. And we're talking about > two bytes.
IMO it was a mistake in RFC1964. We shouldn't repeat mistakes. As far as mistakes go, it's not a big deal, so I don't really care. _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
