On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Sam Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> "Nico" == Nico Williams <[email protected]> writes: > > Nico> For the acceptor name I think it's best to say that the peer > Nico> makes right. > > I don't. > Both the initiator and acceptor send this to the EAP server. > I think the EAP server is in a much better position to do comparison > here than either the peer or acceptor. > It's also totally new code.
Failure to match leads to fail-safe though, no? But if it's all new code, sure, I'd rather you do norm-insensitive comparison in the EAP server. Nico -- _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
