> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Sam Hartman > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:58 AM > To: Cantor, Scott > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [abfab] I-D Action: draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-02.txt > > > 3) We have no business forbidding signatures. We SHOULD mandate that > NASes default to not checking signatures. We SHOULD point out that you can > strip/not issue a signature to make your assertion smaller.
I agree with this BIG TIME. I have just scanned the draft and the fact that no signatures were allowed gave me heartburn. Jim _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
