>>>>> "zhou" == zhou sujing <[email protected]> writes:

    zhou> Hi,all, the following are questions occured to me when reading
    zhou> draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-04:


    zhou> 1. Section 1 "The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)
    zhou> [RFC3748] defines a framework for authenticating a network
    zhou> access client and server in order to gain access to a
    zhou> network."
   
    zhou>   since applicability of EAP is under updating beyond network
    zhou> access, I think the information of Section 7 might as well be
    zhou> indicated here.

I've opened issue #30 to track this.


    zhou> 2.  section 5.4.2 and section 5.7 Why would acceptor name
    zhou> appear in a acceptor name request?

The acceptor name request  asks for a particular acceptor  if the
acceptor is capable of acting as multiple entites/virtual hosts.
It's just like the Host header in HTTP or the server-name-indication in
TLS.
I'd be interested in any clarifications you can suggest so others don't
have the same confusion.

    zhou> 3.  section 5.4.3 "Typically this token would only be send if
    zhou> the acceptor name request is absent."  Acceptor name response
    zhou> is sent only when no acceptor name request has been received?

Jim proposed changing this at IETF 82 and I have seen no objections to
that change.

    zhou> 4. section 5.6 "After EAP success, the initiator sends a token
    zhou> to the acceptor including additional subtokens that negotiate
    zhou> optional features or provide GSS-API channel binding (see
    zhou> Section 6.1)."
   
    zhou>    According to RFC2743, GSS-API channel binding information
    zhou> is provided as an input to GSS_Init_sec_context(), i.e.,
    zhou> before EAP sucess, so how and why send GSS-API channel binding
    zhou> here?


It's not really true that gss_init_sec_context is before eap success.
You call it multiple times.
ONe of those times you need to send GSS channel binding data; the
section you  quote describes how.



    zhou> 5. "The PROT_READY service is never available with this
    zhou> mechanism."  what is PROT_READY service? I cann't find any
    zhou> reference to it.
Section 1.2.7 of RFC 2743; the document has been updated with this
    zhou> reference.




    zhou> Regards~~~

    zhou> -Sujing Zhou

    zhou> -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE
    zhou> Information Security Notice: The information contained in this
    zhou> mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This
    zhou> mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are
    zhou> obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to
    zhou> disclose the contents of this communication to others.  This
    zhou> email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
    zhou> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
    zhou> whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in
    zhou> error please notify the originator of the message. Any views
    zhou> expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
    zhou> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE
    zhou> Anti-Spam system.

    zhou> _______________________________________________ abfab mailing
    zhou> list [email protected]
    zhou> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to