-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/19/2011 04:02 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote: >> I'm more worried that nobody else in the WG chimed in. I'm not >> sure why we should involve DIME in this work though. > > Well. That is where the guys are who work on Diameter. > > In general, it is worthwhile to reach out to other communities > with regard to the generic ABFAB idea. > > Currently, we seem to be focusing on the education / research > community only. Diameter is not widely used in those areas but > rather in the telecommunication space, i.e. fixed and mobile > operators.
I'm still worried that nobody answered. Should we do another call? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7vUk4ACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZneOLQCglNdk7vUSXTjLa3mpzHoY8FAx Ok8An16UCd0SR3iG2YTYffJioS9wKZc1 =zOwO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
