Hi Sam,

if you want to document it then we may need to provide a bit more text.
I could imagine that we find that text in some of the OAuth documents. 

Ciao
Hannes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Sam Hartman [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:09 PM
> To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [abfab] Issue #6 - bad flow of text for authentication
> requriements
> 
> >>>>> ""Tschofenig," == "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN <- FI/Espoo)"
> <[email protected]>> writes:
> 
>     "Tschofenig,> The sentence you are referring to, namely "Aside
from
>     "Tschofenig,> a valuable secret being exposed, a synchronization
>     "Tschofenig,> problem can also often develop." should be deleted.
I
>     "Tschofenig,> understand that there may be a synchronization
> problem
>     "Tschofenig,> when you cache your distribute your long term secret
>     "Tschofenig,> everywhere but that's only secondary (and less
>     "Tschofenig,> important).
> 
> I disagree that this synchronization issue is secondary in terms of
> deployment concerns.  I actually think that the synchronization issue
> drives up support costs and creates a real business case for ABFAB far
> more than the security issues.
> So, I'd rather continue to document this issue.
> 
> --Sam
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to